argument题干 ThefollowingisarecommendationfromtheBoardofDirectorsofMonarchBooks。WerecommendthatMonarchBooksopenacafinitsstore。Monarch,havingbeeninbusinessatthesamelocationformorethantwentyyears,hasalargecustomerbasebecauseitisknownforitswideselectionofbooksonallsubjects。Clearly,openingthecafwouldattractmorecustomers。Spacecouldbemadeforthecafbydiscontinuingthechildrensbooksection,whichwillprobablybecomelesspopulargiventhatthemostrecentnationalcensusindicatedasignificantdeclineinthepercentageofthepopulationunderageten。OpeningacafwillallowMonarchtoattractmorecustomersandbettercompetewithRegalBooks,whichrecentlyopeneditsowncaf。Writearesponseinwhichyoudiscusswhatquestionswouldneedtobeansweredinordertodecidewhethertherecommendationislikelytohavethepredictedresult。Besuretoexplainhowtheanswerstothesequestionswouldhelptoevaluatetherecommendation。 学生原文: Allthearguer’sviewsoundsenergetic,positiveanddogmatic,yetthereisnopenetrationinhisreasoningprocess。HesuggeststhatMonarchBookstoreshouldreplacethechildren’sbooksectionwithacaf,whichwouldmakethebookstoremoreattractivejustlikeRegalBooks。However,somequestionsneedtobeconsidered。Firstly,aretheresufficientevidencethatRegalBookswhichhasopenedacafbecomesmorealluring?ItispossiblethatRegalBookslossessomeofitscustomersafterthecafopening。Maybetheydonotliketheodorofcafandturnstoanotherbookstorethatdonothavethecaf。EvenifRegalBooksattractsmorecustomersindeed,canthecafintheMonarchBookstoreabsorbmorecustomersaswell?Arethesetwobookstorecomparable?PerhapsthesameactionwouldbeineffectiveonMonarchBookstoreduetosomedifferencesbetweenthetwobookstoressuchascustomergroups,geologicallocationandmarketingstrategy。Inaddition,isthemerefactthatmorecustomersarewillingtohavearestatRegalBooksenoughtoillustratethatacafistheonlyfactorforalargecustomer?Thearguerignoresotherfactorssuchasabettergeologicallocation,clevermarketingandstrongercustomerservicethatmaycontributestoRegalBooks’success。Inordertobemoreabsorbing,MonarchBookstoreshouldimproveitselffromotheraspectsbesidesthecaf。Lastbutnotleast,doesthemostrecentnationalcensusindicatingasignificantdeclineinthepercentageofthepopulationunderagetenmaynotnecessarilyapplytoMonarchCity?ItisquitepossiblethatthepercentageofchildreninMonarchCityareincreasinginrecentyears,whichiscontrarytothewholenation。Forthatmatter,itisalsopossiblethatthechildreninMonarchCitytendstronglytoreadbooks,whichaccountsforthehighsalesofthebookstore。Therefore,discontinuingthechildrensbooksectionmaydecreasingthenumberofcustomers,whichachievestheoppositeofwhatthearguerintended。Toconclude,theauthor’srecommendationthatMonarchBookstoreshouldreplacethechildren’sbooksectionwithacafisunpersuasivebeforeconsiderthequestionsmentionedabove。 修改后范例: ThearguersuggeststhatMonarchBookstoreshouldreplacethechildren’sbooksectionwithacaf,whichwouldmakethebookstoremoreattractivejustlikeRegalBooks。Allthearguer’sviewsoundsenergetic,positiveanddogmatic(reasonable),yetthereisnopenetrationin(strongevidencein)hisreasoningprocess。Therearesomequestionsthatneedtobeconsidered。Firstly,istheresufficientevidencethatshowsthatopeningacafcanmaketheRegalBooksmorelucrative?ItispossiblethattheRegalBookshaslostsomeofitscustomersafteropeningacaf。Itisalsopossiblethattheydonotliketheodorofthecafandturntoanotherbookstorethatdoesnothaveacaf。EveniftheRegalBookscertainlyattractsmorecustomers,doesitguaranteethatthecafintheMonarchBookstorecanattractmorecustomersaswell?Arethesetwobookstorescomparable?PerhapsthesameactionwouldbeineffectiveforMonarchBookstoreduetosomedifferencesbetweenthesetwobookstoressuchasdifferentcustomergroups,geologicallocationsandmarketingstrategies。Inaddition,isthemerefactthatmorecustomersarewillingtovisitRegalBooksenoughtoillustratethatacafistheonlyfactorforanincreasingamountofcustomers?Thearguerignoresotherfactors,suchasabettergeologicallocation,aclevermarketingstrategy,andastrongercustomerservice,whichmaycontributetoRegalBooks’success。Inordertobemoreattractiveforbooklovers,MonarchBookstoremightconsidertoimproveitselfbyusingotherstrategiesinsteadofopeningacaf。Lastbutnotleast,doesasignificantdeclineinthepercentageofthepopulationunderageteninthenationalcensuscanrepresentthecircumstancesofMonarchCity?ItisquitepossiblethatthepercentageofchildreninMonarchCityisincreasinginrecentyears,whichiscontrarytothewholenation。Forthatmatter,itisalsopossiblethatthechildreninMonarchCitytendtoreadmorebooksgiventhehighsalesofthelocalbookstores。Therefore,thereispossibilitythatdiscontinuingthechildrensbooksectionmightdecreasethenumberofcustomers,whichmightleadtotheoppositeeffectofwhatthearguerintendstoachieve。Inconclusion,theauthor’srecommendationthatMonarchBookstoreshouldreplacethechildren’sbooksectionwithacafisunpersuasiveconsideringthequestionsmentionedabove。